<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 64 bit VBA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/12/11/64-bit-vba/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/12/11/64-bit-vba/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue,  7 Feb 2012 08:09:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A few miscellaneous things - JP Software Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/12/11/64-bit-vba/comment-page-1/#comment-81704</link>
		<dc:creator>A few miscellaneous things - JP Software Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/?p=974#comment-81704</guid>
		<description>[...] mentioning as we go into another weekend.Ross is all abuzz about 64-bit Excel. Read about it at 64 bit VBA. Turns out there are some important changes that developers need to be aware of if they want to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentioning as we go into another weekend.Ross is all abuzz about 64-bit Excel. Read about it at 64 bit VBA. Turns out there are some important changes that developers need to be aware of if they want to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Karel Pieterse</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/12/11/64-bit-vba/comment-page-1/#comment-78796</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Karel Pieterse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/?p=974#comment-78796</guid>
		<description>You also need to update the delcarations of API statements, see:
http://www.jkp-ads.com/articles/apideclarations.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You also need to update the delcarations of API statements, see:<br />
<a href="http://www.jkp-ads.com/articles/apideclarations.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.jkp-ads.com/articles/apideclarations.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Mclean</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/12/11/64-bit-vba/comment-page-1/#comment-78231</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Mclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/?p=974#comment-78231</guid>
		<description>Hi Ken, yeah that right, any 32 com code wont run in a native 64 app, or OS, but, Office might allow for that and add different compatible types other wise that is going to be a massive issue. 
Someone needs to look into this - where&#039;s the information from MS?!!

And like you say - &quot;As I understand it&quot; dont know too much to sure/100%!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ken, yeah that right, any 32 com code wont run in a native 64 app, or OS, but, Office might allow for that and add different compatible types other wise that is going to be a massive issue.<br />
Someone needs to look into this &#8211; where&#8217;s the information from MS?!!</p>
<p>And like you say &#8211; &#8220;As I understand it&#8221; dont know too much to sure/100%!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Puls</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/12/11/64-bit-vba/comment-page-1/#comment-78226</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Puls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/?p=974#comment-78226</guid>
		<description>Hey there Ross,

There&#039;s also another thing to worry about when moving to 64bit Office.  To my understanding (granted not tested yet), any 32bit ActiveX controls will show as boxes with red x&#039;s in the 64bit version of office, and I&#039;d assume the vice versa.  The controls aren&#039;t compatible back and forth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there Ross,</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also another thing to worry about when moving to 64bit Office.  To my understanding (granted not tested yet), any 32bit ActiveX controls will show as boxes with red x&#8217;s in the 64bit version of office, and I&#8217;d assume the vice versa.  The controls aren&#8217;t compatible back and forth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A few miscellaneous things » Code For Excel And Outlook Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/12/11/64-bit-vba/comment-page-1/#comment-78224</link>
		<dc:creator>A few miscellaneous things » Code For Excel And Outlook Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/?p=974#comment-78224</guid>
		<description>[...] is all abuzz about 64-bit Excel. Read about it at 64 bit VBA. Turns out there are some important changes that developers need to be aware of if they want to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is all abuzz about 64-bit Excel. Read about it at 64 bit VBA. Turns out there are some important changes that developers need to be aware of if they want to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

