<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .Net 4.0 imporvments, Good for Office Devlopers!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/11/24/net-4-0-imporvments-good-for-office-devlopers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/11/24/net-4-0-imporvments-good-for-office-devlopers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed,  8 Sep 2010 23:37:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ross</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/11/24/net-4-0-imporvments-good-for-office-devlopers/comment-page-1/#comment-77530</link>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/?p=895#comment-77530</guid>
		<description>Hi Dennis, that looks like a good tool!
Have you done any testing around the speed improvements via interop? 
Ross</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dennis, that looks like a good tool!<br />
Have you done any testing around the speed improvements via interop?<br />
Ross</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Wallentin</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/11/24/net-4-0-imporvments-good-for-office-devlopers/comment-page-1/#comment-77490</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Wallentin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/?p=895#comment-77490</guid>
		<description>...And in addition:

Check out the IL Stub Diagnostic Tool which I find to be very nice :)

http://clrinterop.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=29745

Kind regards,
Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;And in addition:</p>
<p>Check out the IL Stub Diagnostic Tool which I find to be very nice :)</p>
<p><a href="http://clrinterop.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=29745" rel="nofollow">http://clrinterop.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=29745</a></p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />
Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/11/24/net-4-0-imporvments-good-for-office-devlopers/comment-page-1/#comment-77446</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/?p=895#comment-77446</guid>
		<description>I think 2010 is going to be a good year for VS and Office. I&#039;ve seen a few things in both products which I reckon are excellent.
For one thing in VS2010 you can compile C++ to native code, something not (easily) possible since VS2003.
Optional and named args in C# means C#/Excel is finally a actually realistic combo.
yahoo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 2010 is going to be a good year for VS and Office. I&#8217;ve seen a few things in both products which I reckon are excellent.<br />
For one thing in VS2010 you can compile C++ to native code, something not (easily) possible since VS2003.<br />
Optional and named args in C# means C#/Excel is finally a actually realistic combo.<br />
yahoo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
