Comments on: Is C# like Robby Williams? http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/02/04/is-c-like-robby-william/ Tue, 7 Feb 2012 16:37:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: .Net 4.0 imporvments, Good for Office Devlopers! « Methods In Excel http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/02/04/is-c-like-robby-william/comment-page-1/#comment-77379 .Net 4.0 imporvments, Good for Office Devlopers! « Methods In Excel Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:36:50 +0000 http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/02/04/is-c-like-robby-william/#comment-77379 [...] bogged before about what version 4 of .Net could mean for Office devs. Now the beta’s been out for a while too. [...] [...] bogged before about what version 4 of .Net could mean for Office devs. Now the beta’s been out for a while too. [...]

]]> By: Ross http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/02/04/is-c-like-robby-william/comment-page-1/#comment-68738 Ross Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:41:55 +0000 http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/02/04/is-c-like-robby-william/#comment-68738 Yeah, I wish that they would just make VB, "simple", it's not like you cant drop in to C# if you need to. I just dont, and never have seen the point of having C# and VB! Crazy fools! Maybe they know something we don't - well they certainly do, but you know what I mean! Yeah, I wish that they would just make VB, “simple”, it’s not like you cant drop in to C# if you need to. I just dont, and never have seen the point of having C# and VB!
Crazy fools!

Maybe they know something we don’t – well they certainly do, but you know what I mean!

]]> By: simon http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/02/04/is-c-like-robby-william/comment-page-1/#comment-68644 simon Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:54:19 +0000 http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/02/04/is-c-like-robby-william/#comment-68644 Ross I've been wondering (roughly) the same thing. I remember C# being trumpeteted as being as powerful as C++ but safer and simpler. In reality of course it was just missing a chunk of useful C++ language features. they have almost added them all back now so C# 4 is now almost as powerful and complex as C++. Ross
I’ve been wondering (roughly) the same thing.

I remember C# being trumpeteted as being as powerful as C++ but safer and simpler. In reality of course it was just missing a chunk of useful C++ language features. they have almost added them all back now so C# 4 is now almost as powerful and complex as C++.

]]> By: ross http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/02/04/is-c-like-robby-william/comment-page-1/#comment-66667 ross Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:04:42 +0000 http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/02/04/is-c-like-robby-william/#comment-66667 lol! Yeah, believe it or not I did notice that, but then I though, copyright, trademark, liable! lol! Yeah, believe it or not I did notice that, but then I though, copyright, trademark, liable!

]]> By: Gordon http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/02/04/is-c-like-robby-william/comment-page-1/#comment-66654 Gordon Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:29:32 +0000 http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2009/02/04/is-c-like-robby-william/#comment-66654 [VBA] Function realName(blogSubjectName as string) as string blogSubjectName = Replace(blogSubjectName, "y", "ie") blogSubjectName = Replace(blogSubjectName, "m", "ms") realName = blogSubjectName End Function [/VBA] [VBA]
Function realName(blogSubjectName as string) as string
blogSubjectName = Replace(blogSubjectName, “y”, “ie”)
blogSubjectName = Replace(blogSubjectName, “m”, “ms”)
realName = blogSubjectName
End Function
[/VBA]

]]>