<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whats the second best Spreadsheet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/20/whats-the-second-best-spreadsheet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/20/whats-the-second-best-spreadsheet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue,  7 Feb 2012 16:37:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Methods In Excel &#187; The cost of Office</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/20/whats-the-second-best-spreadsheet/comment-page-1/#comment-62681</link>
		<dc:creator>Methods In Excel &#187; The cost of Office</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/20/whats-the-second-best-spreadsheet/#comment-62681</guid>
		<description>[...] When Simon recently stole my post idea [:-)] with his &quot;Best/Favourite Excel version&quot; it got me thinking what spread sheet offered the best value. I quickly came to the conclusion answering that particular question would be, well a bit rubbish really, and that nobody else would care anyway. But I still wanted to make a post that somehow allowed me to highlight Murphy&#039;s theft(iry). With this goal firmly establish I got to thinking about the cost of developing Office solutions, which in turn lead me to the cost of owing Office period. After a bit of research (which was much harder than I thought it was going to be), I present the following (and look forward to Simon reposting this in a few months :)))))))))))))))! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When Simon recently stole my post idea [:-)] with his &#8220;Best/Favourite Excel version&#8221; it got me thinking what spread sheet offered the best value. I quickly came to the conclusion answering that particular question would be, well a bit rubbish really, and that nobody else would care anyway. But I still wanted to make a post that somehow allowed me to highlight Murphy&#8217;s theft(iry). With this goal firmly establish I got to thinking about the cost of developing Office solutions, which in turn lead me to the cost of owing Office period. After a bit of research (which was much harder than I thought it was going to be), I present the following (and look forward to Simon reposting this in a few months :)))))))))))))))! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/20/whats-the-second-best-spreadsheet/comment-page-1/#comment-41740</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 07:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/20/whats-the-second-best-spreadsheet/#comment-41740</guid>
		<description>I hate the fact that they pulled out the Developer version in Office 2003...Now you cant create DLL&#039;s without having another software installed...
Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the fact that they pulled out the Developer version in Office 2003&#8230;Now you cant create DLL&#8217;s without having another software installed&#8230;<br />
Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/20/whats-the-second-best-spreadsheet/comment-page-1/#comment-41466</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/20/whats-the-second-best-spreadsheet/#comment-41466</guid>
		<description>Intresting you put XP dev ed above 2003, thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intresting you put XP dev ed above 2003, thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/20/whats-the-second-best-spreadsheet/comment-page-1/#comment-41435</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/20/whats-the-second-best-spreadsheet/#comment-41435</guid>
		<description>Ross...unfortunately there is no secod best spreadsheet....If there were...we would not have had Excel 2007....but here is the list...
1) Excel 2002 - In the Developer version of Office
2) Excel 2003
3) Excel 2002 - In the Professional Version of Office 
3) Excel 2000
.
.
.
4) Excel 2007

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross&#8230;unfortunately there is no secod best spreadsheet&#8230;.If there were&#8230;we would not have had Excel 2007&#8230;.but here is the list&#8230;<br />
1) Excel 2002 &#8211; In the Developer version of Office<br />
2) Excel 2003<br />
3) Excel 2002 &#8211; In the Professional Version of Office<br />
3) Excel 2000<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
4) Excel 2007</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

