Comments on: Miss(ed) Shapes? http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/10/18/missed-shapes/ Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:26:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1 by: ross http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/10/18/missed-shapes/#comment-28897 Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:27:22 +0000 http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/10/18/missed-shapes/#comment-28897 Thanks Nicholas Thanks Nicholas

]]> by: Nicholas Hebb http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/10/18/missed-shapes/#comment-28607 Sat, 17 Nov 2007 07:38:51 +0000 http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/10/18/missed-shapes/#comment-28607 One caveat is the BottomRightCell will give funny results. If the right and bottom shape edges lie within the cell, then the result is as expected. But if the shape abuts the right and bottom cell edges*, then the cell returned is one to the right and down one. (* You can have the shape aligned to the cell edges using the snap to grid feature on the Drawing toolbar.) One caveat is the BottomRightCell will give funny results. If the right and bottom shape edges lie within the cell, then the result is as expected. But if the shape abuts the right and bottom cell edges*, then the cell returned is one to the right and down one.

(* You can have the shape aligned to the cell edges using the snap to grid feature on the Drawing toolbar.)

]]>