<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best chart in the world Ever!</title>
	<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/03/05/the-best-chart-in-the-world-ever/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  9 Jul 2008 13:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: OpenOffice downloads &#171; Smurf on Spreadsheets</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/03/05/the-best-chart-in-the-world-ever/#comment-46243</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/03/05/the-best-chart-in-the-world-ever/#comment-46243</guid>
					<description>[...] Sadly the chart looks like a great candidate for Ross&amp;#8217; PPP (Piss Poor Presentation) collection, but what I think its saying is 2.7 million downloads in the last 30 days. It could be saying 600k per day (or 2 days?), but the narrative suggests the 2.7 million. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Sadly the chart looks like a great candidate for Ross&#8217; PPP (Piss Poor Presentation) collection, but what I think its saying is 2.7 million downloads in the last 30 days. It could be saying 600k per day (or 2 days?), but the narrative suggests the 2.7 million. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ross</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/03/05/the-best-chart-in-the-world-ever/#comment-25093</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/03/05/the-best-chart-in-the-world-ever/#comment-25093</guid>
					<description>Anthony, the charts can now be found here, although it looks like they have changed a bit. 
http://www.fusioncharts.com/gadgets/Gallery.asp#cylinder
Cheers
Ross</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony, the charts can now be found here, although it looks like they have changed a bit.<br />
<a href='http://www.fusioncharts.com/gadgets/Gallery.asp#cylinder' rel='nofollow'>http://www.fusioncharts.com/gadgets/Gallery.asp#cylinder</a><br />
Cheers<br />
Ross
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AGaston</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/03/05/the-best-chart-in-the-world-ever/#comment-25092</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/03/05/the-best-chart-in-the-world-ever/#comment-25092</guid>
					<description>The link to this source is missing or moved. Do you have an alternative location to see the charting that has you guys happy as an if statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link to this source is missing or moved. Do you have an alternative location to see the charting that has you guys happy as an if statement.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ross</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/03/05/the-best-chart-in-the-world-ever/#comment-6522</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/03/05/the-best-chart-in-the-world-ever/#comment-6522</guid>
					<description>Yeah that ones amazing – it not even sorted smallest to biggest. It didn’t fit as nicely in a blog post though! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah that ones amazing – it not even sorted smallest to biggest. It didn’t fit as nicely in a blog post though! ;-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/03/05/the-best-chart-in-the-world-ever/#comment-6483</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2007/03/05/the-best-chart-in-the-world-ever/#comment-6483</guid>
					<description>Follow the link in the article...:  

Even better is the stacked pyramid &quot;chart&quot; located above &amp;#38; to the left.  

The values are descending alphabetic order, and the &quot;Chart graphics&quot; do not change with changes in proportion to the measured information.  So, I guess that makes it a picture of a pyramid with an unrelated column of random numbers beside it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow the link in the article&#8230;:  </p>
<p>Even better is the stacked pyramid &#8220;chart&#8221; located above &amp; to the left.  </p>
<p>The values are descending alphabetic order, and the &#8220;Chart graphics&#8221; do not change with changes in proportion to the measured information.  So, I guess that makes it a picture of a pyramid with an unrelated column of random numbers beside it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
